Win Every Argument Buchzusammenfassung - das Wichtigste aus Win Every Argument
Einleitung anhören

Zusammenfassung von Win Every Argument

Mehdi Hasan

The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking

4.2 (734 Bewertungen)
16 Min.

Kurz zusammengefasst

'Win Every Argument' by Mehdi Hasan is a guide on how to become a better debater through logically valid arguments, avoiding fallacies, and mastering rhetorical skills. It's a useful tool for anyone interested in improving their communication and persuasive abilities.


    Win Every Argument
    in 4 Kernaussagen verstehen

    Audio & Text in der Blinkist App
    Kernaussage 1 von 4

    Persuasive arguments appeal to facts and feelings

    Facts don’t care about feelings. So goes the internet adage, anyway. It’s an appealing idea: truth is truth, whether or not we want to believe it. From this thought follows the equally appealing idea that debate is an inherently rational activity. It’s about following the facts and accepting the better argument – the argument which best fits the evidence.

    But it’s never been that simple. The ancient Greeks called the language deployed in such debates rhetoric – a word derived from rhetor, meaning “public speaker.” But for philosophers like Plato, rhetoric was downright pernicious. Honey-tongued debaters, he said, tend to be amoral. Theirs is an art of persuasion that’s just as easily turned to deceiving audiences as it is to the noble task of uncovering truth. Other thinkers didn’t go that far. Aristotle, who wrote the book on rhetoric, literally and figuratively, noted that proper reasoning or logic and rhetoric may be separate pursuits, but they can – and often do – overlap.

    For Aristotle, persuasive speech has three modes. The first is ethos – the Greek word for “character.” Ethos in this context concerns the credibility of a person. We’re more inclined to accept what a practicing doctor has to say about vaccinations, for example, than an anonymous blog author. At least, we should be, anyway; as we saw during the pandemic, the link between expertise and credibility isn’t as strong as it once was – but that’s a different topic.

    The second is pathos or “emotion.” In Aristotle’s words, “Our judgments when we are pleased and friendly are not the same as when we are pained and hostile.” Imagine that our doctor’s credentials haven’t persuaded their reluctant patient, so they start telling the patient a story about a couple in perfect health who refused to get vaccinated. Both died within 15 days of each other, the doctor says, leaving behind four young children. That’s pathos: the attempt to sway an audience by appealing to powerful emotions such as love and fear.

    Finally, there’s logos or reasoning. This form of persuasion deals in facts and figures. If our doctor points out that multiple peer-reviewed studies show that COVID vaccines result in a 90 percent decrease in the risk of hospitalization and death, they’re appealing to logos. 

    In contemporary debates, it’s usually logos that’s asked to do the heavy lifting. That makes sense: we extol facts and figures, data and statistics, because we want our arguments to be rooted in truth. In an ideal world, the evidence would do its own talking. But that’s rarely how public debates play out. In the real world, logically unassailable arguments fall short and leave audiences cold. People are stubborn. Reactive. Overconfident. Afraid of change. More importantly, they’re emotionally invested in beliefs, ideas, and ideals. That adage, then, has it back to front: often enough, it’s our feelings which don’t care about the facts.

    For self-avowed rationalists, the issue is simple: we’ve forgotten how to reason properly. If we trained ourselves to think more dispassionately, public debates would become more rational. 

    That view assumes that reason and emotion are separate – and contradictory – things. But new research into human cognition has called that assumption into question. As the neuroscientist Antonio Damasio summarizes the findings of this new research, humans are neither thinking nor feeling machines, but “feeling machines that think.” Let’s break that down.

    In his acclaimed book Descartes’ Error, Damasio looks at people who’ve suffered damage to the part of the brain which handles emotional processing – the prefrontal cortex. At first glance, these people seemed to be reasoning machines: theirs was a black-and-white world of pure logic in which the fuzzy gray tones of emotions had disappeared. Being unemotional, though, didn’t make them more rational. Instead, they became “uninvolved spectators” in their own lives who struggled to assign different values to different options. They could know, but they couldn’t feel. Reason, Damasio concludes, isn’t a standalone faculty. Without feelings, our decision-making landscape becomes “hopelessly flat.” In short, to make rational decisions we need a jolt of emotion. 

    What does that have to do with winning arguments? In a word, everything. To win an argument, you have to get your listeners to make a decision – they have to choose you over your opponent. If neuroscientists like Damasio are right and the heart leads the head, pure logos won’t cut it: you also have to appeal to listeners’ feelings. This isn’t about jettisoning reason and simply saying what people want to hear. The point, here, is that audiences may only accept better, more truthful arguments once the person making them has established an emotional connection. Put differently, pathos may be the best vehicle to deliver logos.

    Du möchtest die gesamte Zusammenfassung von Win Every Argument sehen?

    Kernaussagen in Win Every Argument

    Mehr Wissen in weniger Zeit
    Sachbücher auf den Punkt gebracht
    Sachbücher auf den Punkt gebracht
    Kernaussagen aus Sachbüchern in ca. 15 Minuten pro Titel lesen & anhören mit den „Blinks”
    Zeitsparende Empfehlungen
    Zeitsparende Empfehlungen
    Titel, die dein Leben bereichern, passend zu deinen Interessen und Zielen
    Podcasts in Kurzform
    Podcasts in Kurzform Neu
    Kernaussagen wichtiger Podcasts im Kurzformat mit den neuen „Shortcasts”

    Worum geht es in Win Every Argument?

    Win Every Argument (2023) is a guide to the art of argument by one of the world’s most combative debaters: journalist, anchor, and writer Mehdi Hasan. Drawing on ancient theories of persuasion, neuroscientific theories of cognition, and the rhetorical tricks of contemporary politicians, Hasan reveals the secrets to winning arguments in today’s post-factual world.

    Bewertung von Win Every Argument

    Win Every Argument (2021) is a book that equips readers with the tools needed to effectively argue and persuade others. Here's why this book is worth reading:

    • Packed with practical strategies and techniques, it empowers readers to confidently navigate debates and win over even the toughest opponents.
    • By exploring logical fallacies and cognitive biases that impact arguments, the book offers valuable insights into how to construct persuasive and convincing arguments.
    • With its engaging anecdotes and real-life examples, the book brings the principles of effective arguing to life, making it a captivating read that is anything but boring.

    Wer Win Every Argument lesen sollte

    • Natural-born arguers and debaters
    • Anyone interested in the art of persuasion
    • Public speakers and politicos

    Über den Autor

    Mehdi Hasan is an award-winning British American journalist, anchor, and author. He’s the host of The Mehdi Hasan Show on MSNBC and a regular contributor to newspapers including the New York Times and the Washington Post. Hasan is a former political editor of the New Statesman and a former columnist for the Intercept. Win Every Argument is his second book. 

    Kategorien mit Win Every Argument

    Ähnliche Zusammenfassungen wie Win Every Argument

    ❤️ für Blinkist️️️ 
    Ines S.

    Ich bin begeistert. Ich liebe Bücher aber durch zwei kleine Kinder komme ich einfach nicht zum Lesen. Und ja, viele Bücher haben viel bla bla und die Quintessenz ist eigentlich ein Bruchteil.

    Genau dafür ist Blinkist total genial! Es wird auf das Wesentliche reduziert, die Blinks sind gut verständlich, gut zusammengefasst und auch hörbar! Das ist super. 80 Euro für ein ganzes Jahr klingt viel, aber dafür unbegrenzt Zugriff auf 3000 Bücher. Und dieses Wissen und die Zeitersparnis ist unbezahlbar.

    Ekaterina S.

    Extrem empfehlenswert. Statt sinnlos im Facebook zu scrollen höre ich jetzt täglich zwischen 3-4 "Bücher". Bei manchen wird schnelle klar, dass der Kauf unnötig ist, da schon das wichtigste zusammen gefasst wurde..bei anderen macht es Lust doch das Buch selbständig zu lesen. Wirklich toll

    Nils S.

    Einer der besten, bequemsten und sinnvollsten Apps die auf ein Handy gehören. Jeden morgen 15-20 Minuten für die eigene Weiterbildung/Entwicklung oder Wissen.

    Julia P.

    Viele tolle Bücher, auf deren Kernaussagen reduziert- präzise und ansprechend zusammengefasst. Endlich habe ich das Gefühl, Zeit für Bücher zu finden, für die ich sonst keine Zeit habe.

    Leute mochten auch die Zusammenfassungen

    4,7 Sterne
    Durchschnittliche Bewertung im App Store und Play Store
    30 Millionen
    Downloads auf allen Plattformen
    10+ Jahre
    Erfahrung als Impulsgeber für persönliches Wachstum
    Die besten Ideen aus den Top-Sachbüchern

    Hol dir mit Blinkist die besten Erkenntnisse aus mehr als 7.000 Sachbüchern und Podcasts. In 15 Minuten lesen oder anhören!

    Jetzt kostenlos testen

    Win Every Argument FAQs 

    What is the main message of Win Every Argument?

    The main message of Win Every Argument is to equip readers with the skills to argue effectively and persuasively.

    How long does it take to read Win Every Argument?

    The reading time for Win Every Argument varies, but it typically takes several hours. The Blinkist summary can be read in just 15 minutes.

    Is Win Every Argument a good book? Is it worth reading?

    Win Every Argument is worth reading. It provides practical strategies for effective communication and helps readers strengthen their persuasive abilities.

    Who is the author of Win Every Argument?

    The author of Win Every Argument is Mehdi Hasan.