Das sind die Blinks zu
In Defense of Food
An Eater’s Manifesto
In Defense of Food is a close examination of the rise of nutritionism in our culture, and a historical account of the industrialization of food. An expert in food ecology, author Michael Pollan takes a look at the way in which the food industry shifted our dietary focus from “food” to “nutrients,” and thus narrowed the objective of eating to one of maintaining physical health – a goal it did not accomplish.
- Anyone concerned about his or her diet and health, and looking to improve them
- Anyone interested in the actual impact of nutritionism on our physical health
- Anyone seeking alternatives to the Western diet
Michael Pollan is a journalist and professor of journalism at UC Berkeley. He is a well-known author in the field of food sociology, food science and evolution. Pollan’s previous books include The Omnivore’s Dilemma and Food Rules: An Eater’s Manual.
Kennst du schon Blinkist Premium?
Mit Blinkist Premium erhältst du Zugang zu dem Wichtigsten aus mehr als 3.500 Sachbuch-Bestsellern. Das Probeabo ist 100% kostenlos.
Premium kostenlos testenWas ist Blinkist?
Blinkist ist eine App, die die großen Ideen der besten Sachbücher in einprägsame Kurztexte verpackt und erklärt. Die Inhalte der über 3.500 Titel starken Bibliothek reichen von Sachbuch-Klassikern, über populäre Ratgeber bis hin zu diskutierten Neuerscheinungen. Basierend auf wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen wird jeder Titel von speziell geschulten Autoren aufbereitet und dem Nutzer als Kurztext und Audiotitel zur Verfügung gestellt.
Kostenlos testenDiscover
3.500+ top
nonfiction titles
Get unlimited access to the most important ideas in business, investing, marketing, psychology, politics, and more. Stay ahead of the curve with recommended reading lists curated by experts.
Kostenlos testenEntdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:
Entdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:
Entdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:
In Defense of Food
An Eater’s Manifesto
- Lesedauer: 19 Minuten
- Verfügbar in Text & Audio
- 12 Kernaussagen
Worum geht's
In Defense of Food is a close examination of the rise of nutritionism in our culture, and a historical account of the industrialization of food. An expert in food ecology, author Michael Pollan takes a look at the way in which the food industry shifted our dietary focus from “food” to “nutrients,” and thus narrowed the objective of eating to one of maintaining physical health – a goal it did not accomplish.
Kernaussage 1 von 12
In the twentieth century, we began to talk about consuming nutrients rather than eating food.
Think back to the last time you wanted to start following a healthier diet. Did you think, “I’ll start eating carrots and cucumbers and stop eating beef and cheese”? Or did you think, “I need to cut out saturated fats and starchy carbohydrates, and eat lots more vitamins and minerals instead”?
If you’re like most people, the details of your new diet were expressed in the language of nutrients, rather than specific foods.
But when did this shift in focus happen? And why?
In the second half of the twentieth century, the food industry and the US government shifted their focus from food to nutrients.
Around 1950, a number of scientists believed that the consumption of fat and cholesterol (i.e., meat and dairy products) was responsible for the rise in heart disease. They called this the lipid hypothesis.
Then, in 1968, the US government set up the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, which produced a report in 1977, “The Dietary Goals for the United States,” based largely on the lipid hypothesis.
One goal of the committee was to advise people to reduce their consumption of meat and dairy products in order to prevent heart problems. However, the head of the committee, senator George McGovern, happened to own many cattle ranches. Recommending that people should cut out red meat would have been damaging both to his interests and those of the powerful food lobbyists.
So, the wording of the committee’s recommendations was changed. Where they’d previously advised “don’t eat meat and dairy products,” they were instead coerced to advise people to “choose meats, poultry and fish that will reduce saturated fat intake.” Such a recommendation was a much smaller threat to the food industry.
And with this, the discourse of diets began to change: we started to talk about healthy eating not in terms of what foods to eat but in terms of nutrients.
Inhalt
- In the twentieth century, we began to talk about consuming nutrients rather than eating food.
- The claim that nutrients determine a food’s healthiness can lead us to misinterpret its actual health content.
- Based on just a hypothesis, the Dietary Goals of the US cleared the path for a golden age in food science.
- Sacrificing pleasure-based diets for a scientific dietary approach has not had any noticeable effect on our health.
- The main cause of our poor health is the Western diet.
- We need to start thinking of food as a relationship, and health as the product of being in it.
- The achievements of industrial agriculture (fast production and long preservation) have come at a high cost.
- We need to escape the Western diet and return to a “food culture.”
- What to eat? 1: Choose natural, simple and unpretentious food.
- What to eat? 2: Eat plants, as they provide the most nutrients from the soil, but make sure the soil is good.
- Remember, even if you follow a healthy diet, you should make sure you don’t eat too much.
- Final summary
