Science of Evil Book Summary - Science of Evil Book explained in key points
Listen to the Intro
00:00

Science of Evil summary

Simon Baron-Cohen

On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty

19 mins

Brief summary

Science of Evil delves into the roots of human cruelty, exploring how empathy deficits lead to acts of evil. Simon Baron-Cohen examines psychological and neurological perspectives to understand and potentially mitigate these behaviors.

Table of Contents

    Science of Evil
    Summary of 5 key ideas

    Audio & text in the Blinkist app
    Key idea 1 of 5

    Cruelty becomes possible when we treat humans as things

    That humans are capable of causing extreme harm to one another is well known. We bear witness to this distressing fact every time we open a newspaper or turn on the TV. The history of our species is, in part, a long tale of genocide, persecution, and torture. So if we move beyond the concept of evil, we need to find another way to explain this capacity for cruelty. 

    The answer, we’ll see, lies in empathy erosion. Unlike evil, which is hard to define and harder still to measure, this concept has sturdy scientific foundations. 

    But before we get to that, we need to clarify our terms. 

    Erosion is simple enough: it’s the gradual destruction or diminution of something. Empathy is a little more complicated. Originally derived from the German word Einfühlung, it literally means “feeling into.” It’s sometimes conflated with sympathy – a related but ultimately distinct concept. To sympathize is to feel compassion or sorrow with or alongside another person: while sympathizing, you maintain your own perspective. To empathize, by contrast, is to consider things from another person’s point of view – to “climb into his skin and walk around in it,” as the lawyer Atticus Finch puts it in Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird

    Here’s what makes empathy special: when we take another person’s view of things, we don’t forget our own point of view – we straddle both perspectives. Empathy has a “double focus:” we’re thinking about our own minds while taking another person’s mind into account. This helps us understand what might happen when our empathy is eroded: we become single-minded. Our attention is like a spotlight with a narrow focus; it only illuminates our own interests and perspectives. The other person disappears from view. 

    More precisely, the other person as a person disappears from view. To understand this better, we can turn to the twentieth-century philosopher Martin Buber. According to Buber, we adopt one of two modes in our relationships with others. When we’re in the “I-thou” mode, we treat people as complete beings – that is, we see their inherent dignity and worth and act accordingly. When we’re in the “I-it” mode, we see things differently. We prioritize our own goals and treat others as a means to those ends. In this mode, we discount the other’s subjectivity and intrinsic worth. 

    This brings us to a working definition of empathy erosion: it’s a state of mind in which we relate to people as if they were things that either serve or interfere with our own interests. 

    Want to see all full key ideas from Science of Evil?

    Key ideas in Science of Evil

    More knowledge in less time
    Read or listen
    Read or listen
    Get the key ideas from nonfiction bestsellers in minutes, not hours.
    Find your next read
    Find your next read
    Get book lists curated by experts and personalized recommendations.
    Shortcasts
    Shortcasts New
    We’ve teamed up with podcast creators to bring you key insights from podcasts.

    What is Science of Evil about?

    The Science of Evil (2011) seeks to understand what causes people to be cruel to one another. Doing away with the unscientific concept of “evil,” it suggests that the deeds we commonly associate with that word can be better explained by an absence of empathy. Cruelty, it argues, becomes possible when we lose sight of others’ humanity and treat them as mere objects. 

    Who should read Science of Evil?

    • Anyone interested in empathy and interpersonal relationships
    • Professionals in mental health and therapeutic fields
    • Curious minds seeking to understand the science behind moral behavior

    About the Author

    Simon Baron-Cohen is a professor of developmental psychopathology and the director of the Autism Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of over 600 scientific articles. His books include The Pattern Seekers and The Essential Difference

    Categories with Science of Evil

    Book summaries like Science of Evil

    People ❤️ Blinkist 
    Sven O.

    It's highly addictive to get core insights on personally relevant topics without repetition or triviality. Added to that the apps ability to suggest kindred interests opens up a foundation of knowledge.

    Thi Viet Quynh N.

    Great app. Good selection of book summaries you can read or listen to while commuting. Instead of scrolling through your social media news feed, this is a much better way to spend your spare time in my opinion.

    Jonathan A.

    Life changing. The concept of being able to grasp a book's main point in such a short time truly opens multiple opportunities to grow every area of your life at a faster rate.

    Renee D.

    Great app. Addicting. Perfect for wait times, morning coffee, evening before bed. Extremely well written, thorough, easy to use.

    People also liked these summaries

    4.8 Stars
    Average ratings on iOS and Google Play
    35 Million
    Downloads on all platforms
    10+ years
    Experience igniting personal growth
    Powerful ideas from top nonfiction

    Try Blinkist to get the key ideas from 7,500+ bestselling nonfiction titles and podcasts. Listen or read in just 15 minutes.

    Get started