Get the key ideas from
Distinction
A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
Distinction (1979) is widely considered one of the most important works of twentieth-century sociology. Drawing on extensive empirical research and developing many new concepts that have had a lasting impact on the social sciences, it puts forward a groundbreaking theory about the relationship between taste and class.
- Students of sociology
- Fans of French theory
- Anyone interested in the underpinnings of class or taste
Pierre Bourdieu was one of the most influential sociologists of the twentieth century. A professor at the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences and the Collège de France in Paris, his academic work covered a wide array of subjects ranging from the sociological dimensions of education to aesthetics. He was the recipient of the Goffman Prize from the University of California, Berkeley, the Huxley Medal from the Royal Anthropological Institute, and the Médaille d'Or from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Go Premium and get the best of Blinkist
Upgrade to Premium now and get unlimited access to the Blinkist library. Read or listen to key insights from the world’s best nonfiction.
Upgrade to PremiumWhat is Blinkist?
The Blinkist app gives you the key ideas from a bestselling nonfiction book in just 15 minutes. Available in bitesize text and audio, the app makes it easier than ever to find time to read.
Start free trialDiscover
4,500+ top
nonfiction titles
Get unlimited access to the most important ideas in business, investing, marketing, psychology, politics, and more. Stay ahead of the curve with recommended reading lists curated by experts.
Start free trialJoin Blinkist to get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Distinction
A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
- Read in 25 minutes
- Audio & text available
- Contains 16 key ideas
Synopsis
Distinction (1979) is widely considered one of the most important works of twentieth-century sociology. Drawing on extensive empirical research and developing many new concepts that have had a lasting impact on the social sciences, it puts forward a groundbreaking theory about the relationship between taste and class.
Key idea 1 of 16
We associate different tastes with different social classes.
Imagine two people with very different tastes in leisure activities. The first person likes to attend classical music concerts and visit art museums, while the second prefers to watch wrestling matches and go to amusement parks.
Now, if you had to guess, to which social class would you say each person probably belongs?
Chances are, you’d say the first person probably belongs to a much “higher” class than the second one. And that’s because all of us have intuitions about taste that are strongly tied up with our ideas about class.
The key message here is: We associate different tastes with different social classes.
Generally speaking, we tend to divide both tastes and classes along a scale that goes from low to high. At the bottom of the scale, there are the “popular” tastes of the working class. Next up, there are the “middle-brow” tastes of the middle class. And at the highest end, there are the “bourgeois” tastes of the upper class, along with what sociologists call the “legitimate” tastes of the cultural elite.
The cultural elite includes the more “refined” members of the upper class but also thought-leaders and taste-makers like intellectuals and artists. They may not be affluent, but they do have a lot of cultural cachet, so their tastes carry a lot of weight.
Now, the details of all these tastes vary from culture to culture. They also change from one era to the next. They can even differ within the same society during the same time period based on factors beyond class, such as ethnicity, gender, age, and place of residence. For instance, residents of trendy and happening cities tend to have more “fashionable” tastes than people in small, sleepy towns – even if they’re members of the same class.
It’s, therefore, impossible to give any timeless, universal examples here. The ones that author Pierre Bourdieu focuses on are drawn from 1960s France, so many of them will seem dated or culturally specific to us now. For instance, back then, “The Blue Danube” was an example of popular French taste in music, while “Hungarian Rhapsody” was middle-brow, and “Concerto for the Left Hand” was “legitimate.” Nowadays, many people wouldn’t even be familiar with any of these pieces of music.
But Bourdieu invites us to apply his ideas to our own cultural contexts, so let’s take him up on that invitation for a moment. In your society today, what would you consider popular, middle-brow, and legitimate tastes in music?
We don’t want to offend anyone by calling their favorite artist “middle-brow,” so you fill in the blanks here.
Key ideas in this title
- We associate different tastes with different social classes.
- To scientifically understand people’s tastes, we must take into account their ordinary ways of thinking about them.
- People’s ideas about taste and class play an active role in shaping the realities of taste and class.
- Bourdieu advanced a hypothesis that builds on and refines our intuitions about the relationship between taste and class.
- Our notions about taste and class represent a “misrecognized” form of practical knowledge.
- Taste and class have three dimensions: volume of capital, composition of capital, and social trajectory.
- Our social status reflects our economic and cultural capital, and we can convert one type of capital into the other.
- People protect and improve their social status by converting economic capital and cultural capital into each other.
- People’s tastes are correlated to their class positions within the three-dimensional space of the social hierarchy.
- The correlations between taste and class can be further clarified by accounting for social trajectory.
- Pierre Bourdieu’s survey results confirmed his hypothesis.
- People’s tastes emerge out of and reflect the material conditions of their class positions.
- People’s tastes are ultimately rooted in their habitus.
- The tastes of the affluent elite provide them with a way of marking themselves off from other classes.
- Taste provides us with a way of making class distinctions.
- Final summary
