<p>Who is the author of Unfair?</p>

<p>Adam Benforado is the author of Unfair.</p>

Psychology

Unfair Book Summary - Unfair Book explained in key points

Listen to the Intro

00:00

Unfair summary

Name: Unfair
Rating: 4.2 (17 reviews)
Author: Adam Benforado

Adam Benforado

The New Science of Criminal Justice

4.2 (17 ratings)

28 mins

Brief summary

"Unfair" by Adam Benforado discusses how our justice system is flawed due to unconscious biases. It exposes how what is perceived as fairness is often just a mirage, and how these flaws impact our society.

Topics

US Politics US History

Table of Contents

Unfair
Summary of 12 key ideas

Audio & text in the Blinkist app

Key idea 1 of 12

What’s in it for me? Discover what’s wrong with our legal system and what we can do about it.

In 2000, a 40-year-old, happily married Virginia schoolteacher began experiencing strange sexual urges, which eventually pushed him to begin collecting child pornography and even pushed him to attempt to molest his stepdaughter. When the man later sought help for severe headaches, a brain scan revealed a large tumor in his brain.

When the tumor was removed, all of his abnormal sexual urges disappeared. This unsettling episode raises important questions about criminality and guilt; in a case like this, who is really committing the crime, the man or the tumor?

And it is not only criminals whose behavior can be easily and unconsciously swayed by neurological shifts in the brain; judges, lawyers, cops and juries are all subject to cognitive biases that, taken together, have helped create a deeply unfair justice system in the United States.

These blinks will show you how the United States’ justice system is corrupted from all sides by our faulty brains, as well as the steps we can take to make the system fair.

In these blinks, you’ll learn

how David Rosenbaum of The New York Times died from a vomit stain on his shoulder;
why judges judge more fairly after lunch; and
why current ways of punishing criminals are just not working.

Hastily assigning the wrong labels to people can lead to unfair treatment.

Can a vomit stain make the difference between life and death? It did for New York Times reporter David Rosenbaum. After he was attacked on the street, passersby who found him lying unconscious on the curb spotted a vomit stain on his jacket. They thus assumed he was just another drunk and not in critical condition.

Tragically, David ultimately died from head injuries, and things might well have turned out differently if he hadn’t been mislabeled.

Unfortunately, these kinds of mistakes aren’t rare. Humans are quick to jump to conclusions based on scant evidence, largely due to the interplay between two main processes that order our brains.

First, the automatic process takes in a scene and forms rapid conclusions based on the evidence presented, disregarding missing pieces. Second, the deliberative mental process works through information more diligently and can override these initial impressions.

In David’s case, firefighters, cops and hospital staff all attributed the vomit stain to drunkenness via the automatic process. Without deferring to the deliberative process, they all discounted the possibility that he was actually in need of urgent medical attention.

This story demonstrates the fact that how we label victims affects how their cases are handled.

Consider this neurological study: when people looked at photos of Olympic athletes, middle-class Americans or the disabled, the region of their brain involved with human interaction was activated. But, when asked to look at photos of homeless people and addicts, participants registered no activity in that area; instead, their brain activity corresponded with feelings of disgust.

This study confirms a sad fact: most of us don’t regard those who are desperately down and out as human beings with feelings and needs. Instead, we tend to view alcoholism and similar disorders as choices, or voluntary behaviors. This tendency is called moral distancing, and it leads us to treat substance abusers differently.

Clearly, we need to avoid assigning damaging labels to others. In the next blink, you’ll find out how.

Suspects are subject to grueling interrogations, which can lead to false confessions.

Consider the story of Juan Rivera, an Illinois man who falsely confessed to the rape and murder of an eleven-year-old girl. His semen didn’t match the sample in the police evidence and he had an alibi, but he was still sent to prison. Although he was eventually freed after wrongly spending over 15 years in prison, the question remains: why do people confess to crimes they didn’t commit?

One key factor is that we automatically assume people believe what they say, even when we have evidence to the contrary. For instance, in one famous study, researchers asked people to evaluate various essays about Fidel Castro. Even though participants were told that the authors had been randomly assigned pro- or anti-Castro positions, readers still believed the pro-Castro writers were genuinely committed to their stances.

Brain trauma and situational factors lead people to criminality.

Few people are born evil. Rather, there are certain behavioral or situational circumstances – like poverty, social pressure or even brain trauma – that can lead people to criminality.

The brain is naturally what controls our thoughts, emotions and behavior, but it is also hugely complex, and different parts of the brain each have a massive impact on how we act.

Like the rest of us, lawyers manage to maintain a virtuous self-image – even when they break rules.

Dishonest behavior is far more common than we’d like to believe; almost everyone breaks rules from time to time. Some people illegally download movies, others fudge the numbers to pad out their expense accounts and students sometimes cheat on tests or assignments.

But here’s the interesting part: we lie to ourselves to justify this kind of unethical behavior, all in order to preserve a virtuous self-image.

Jurors’ life experiences, as well as camera perspective bias, can powerfully influence a verdict.

Any time a politician denies the existence of climate change, people rush to call him an idiot – but is that actually fair? It can be hard to accept, but other people might have a reasonable justification for holding different views from one’s own.

Ultimately, our disagreements reflect differences in our backgrounds, not character flaws.

Human memory is extremely unreliable and erroneous eyewitness accounts lead to wrongful convictions.

We like to think otherwise, but eyewitness accounts are extremely unreliable, and this can have tragic consequences.

This was the case for John Jerome White – an elderly woman wrongly identified him as the man who broke into her home and raped her.

Like the rest of us, experts fail to accurately distinguish lies from truth.

We tend to trust experts, believing that their training and experience allows them to detect lies and unravel the truth. But unfortunately, that’s just not the case.

For starters, regular people and experts alike usually fail at detecting lies, as numerous studies have confirmed. Generally, most of the conventional wisdom we hear about spotting lies isn’t borne out of fact; an averted gaze doesn’t necessarily indicate a fib, and liars tend to fidget less than truth-tellers, not more.

Justice isn’t blind; everything from social background to momentary bouts of hunger can determine judicial bias.

Blind justice is one of the foundational principles of democracy. Accordingly, we expect judges to remain objective and unbiased by keeping their personal views out of the courtroom.

But, of course, that doesn’t always happen. How else would you explain the fact that judges who have a daughter, rather than a son, are 16 percent more likely to decide gender-related civil rights cases in favor of women’s rights?

The public’s desire for retribution skews our justice system.

Nobody wants to admit it, but a central goal of the US justice system is not only to deter potential offenders and incapacitate dangerous people – it also punishes out of vengeance.

To illustrate this point, psychologist Geoff Goodwin looked at public responses to shark attacks in order to determine the extent to which people were motivated by retribution.

Solitary confinement is not only ineffective, it’s torture.

Compared to other countries, the United States’ justice system is unique – and not in a good way. Minor crimes are penalized far more harshly than in other places, and the United States is the only Western country where capital punishment is still legal.

Plus, the prison system continues to embrace solitary confinement. Though proponents argue that keeping inmates in isolation leads to self-reflection and remorse, that’s simply not the case. As we’ve seen in earlier blinks, criminals aren’t necessarily rational people who made bad decisions based on clear reasoning or deliberation.

There are three challenges that must be overcome to have a fairer justice system.

We’ve learned all about the fundamental injustice of the United States’ justice system. If citizens take action, they can reform the justice system to make it fairer. But in doing so, they will face three challenges:

First, they will need to eliminate the establishment-supported notion that simple self-reflection can eliminate bias. Overstating our own objectivity entrenches our most deep-seated biases, which leads to unfair sentences.

The United States must restructure its justice system on the basis of scientific evidence and reduce dependence on human faculties.

As we’ve established, the United States’ justice system has a lot of problems. But the biggest problem of all is the fact that Americans have gotten used to it! This needs to be the starting point for all reform efforts.

In this way, instead of accepting the status quo, Americans can restructure the system on the basis of scientific evidence rather than conventional wisdom.

Want to see all full key ideas from Unfair?

Key ideas in Unfair

More knowledge in less time

Read or listen

Get the key ideas from nonfiction bestsellers in minutes, not hours.

Find your next read

Get book lists curated by experts and personalized recommendations.

Shortcasts ^New

We’ve teamed up with podcast creators to bring you key insights from podcasts.

What is Unfair about?

Unfair (2015) outlines the major flaws inherent to the United States’ justice system. In addition to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony or the arbitrary nature of many judges’ decisions, every actor in the entire justice system – cops, lawyers, jurors and judges alike – is fundamentally, yet unconsciously, biased. Ultimately, the author argues that addressing these blind biases is the key to reforming our justice system.

Unfair Review

Unfair (2015) sheds light on the flaws and biases of our justice system, making it an essential read for anyone interested in understanding the shortcomings of our legal system. Here's why this book stands out:

With its thorough research and compelling case studies, it exposes the hidden biases and systemic issues that plague our justice system.
By presenting stories and examples that highlight the inherent inequality and injustice in the criminal justice system, the book challenges readers to question long-held beliefs and assumptions.
Through its thought-provoking analysis, the book invites readers to reflect on the need for reforms and the importance of pursuing justice for all.

Best quote from Unfair

The labels we give victims can make a big difference in how their cases are handled.

—Adam Benforado

Who should read Unfair?

Anyone interested in law, ethics and society
Lawyers and law students curious about the foundations of the US justice system
Anyone with aspirations to change the world for the better

About the Author

Adam Benforado is an associate professor of law at Drexel University. He served as a clerk on the United States Court of Appeals and worked as an attorney at Jenner & Block. His scholarly articles, op-eds and essays have appeared in various publications including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Emory Law Journal.

Categories with Unfair

Psychology Society & Culture

Book summaries like Unfair

How Highly Effective People Speak

Peter Andrei

How High Performers Use Psychology to Influence With Ease

A Natural and Cultural History

10 min

4.0

The Miracle of Mindfulness

Thich Nhat Hanh

An Introduction to the Practice of Meditation

Make Easier Decisions, Stop Second-Guessing, and Bring More Joy to Your Life

20 min

4.4

Sun Tzu and the Art of Business

Mark R. McNeilly

Six Strategic Principles for Managers

How Compassionate Accountability Builds Vibrant Relationships, Thriving Workplaces, and Meaningful Lives

Six Steps to Unlock Your True Motivation, Harness Your Willpower, and Get Out of Your Own Way

16 min

4.0

How the World Really Works

Vaclav Smil

The Science of Our Past, Present and Future

22 min

4.4

Seven Brief Lessons on Physics

Carlo Rovelli

A mind-bending introduction to modern physics

19 min

4.4

How to Think Like a Roman Emperor

Donald Robertson

The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius

The Neuroscience of Manifestation and How It Changes Everything

The Six Killer Apps of Western Power

Thinking Our Way to Chronic Health

Past, Present and Future

25 min

4.4

Nonviolent Communication

Marshall B. Rosenberg

The Psychology of Persuasion

The True Tale of America’s Opiate Epidemic

35 min

4.5

The Open Society and Its Enemies

Karl R. Popper

Examine the Defense of Democracy and Freedom

18 min

4.1

A Court of Thorns and Roses

Sarah J. Maas

A Fantasy and Romance Novel Filled With Dangerous Faeries

The New Science of Planet Hunting in the Cosmos

19 min

168 Hours

Laura Vanderkam

You Have More Time Than You Think

How to Boost Your Sex IQ and Own Your Pleasure

20 min

3.8

Killing Lincoln

Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard

The Shocking Assassination that Changed America Forever

14 min

4.3

Women Who Run with the Wolves

Clarissa Pinkola Estés

Myths and Stories of the Wild Woman Archetype

18 min

4.2

What Does It All Mean?

Thomas Nagel

A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy

Discover Your Chronotype – and the Best Time to Eat Lunch, Ask for a Raise, Have Sex, Write a Novel, Take Your Meds, and More

The Last of the Soviets

17 min

4.2

Good Economics for Hard Times

Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo

Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems

30 min

4.0

Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels

Ian Morris

How Human Values Evolve

22 min

4.0

How to Talk to Anyone

Leil Lowndes

92 Little Tricks for Big Success in Relationships

Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business

How Stories, Stats, and Studies Exploit Our Biases

The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal

What You're Missing and Why It Matters

A Guide to Breath, Consciousness, and Radical Self-Transformation

15 min

The Wisdom of Insecurity

Alan Watts

A Message for an Age of Anxiety

11 min

4.4

Shattered

Jonathan Allen & Amie Parnes

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign

20 min

3.7

Doubt: A History

Jennifer Michael Hecht

The Great Doubters and Their Legacy of Innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson

Explore the Evolution of Inequality and a Path to a Better Future

40 Lessons for a New Kind of Entrepreneur

Lessons from a Lifetime of Transformations

The New Science of Self-Actualization

29 min

4.5

Married at First Sight

Gu Lingfei

Enter a World of Secrets and Drama in This Modern Romance

21 min

4.1

What You Do Is Who You Are

Ben Horowitz

How to Create Your Business Culture

24 min

4.2

Change Your World

John C. Maxwell and Rob Hoskins

How Anyone, Anywhere Can Make a Difference

25 min

4.3

The Obstacle is the Way

Ryan Holiday

The Timeless Art of Turning Trials Into Triumph

How to Accept Your Fears, Release the Past, and Live Your Courageous Life

21 min

4.4

A Brief History of Time

Stephen Hawking

From the Big Bang to Black Holes

27 min

4.5

Good Reasons for Bad Feelings

Randolph M. Nesse

Insights from the Frontier of Evolutionary Psychiatry

28 min

4.3

People ❤️ Blinkist

Sven O.

It's highly addictive to get core insights on personally relevant topics without repetition or triviality. Added to that the apps ability to suggest kindred interests opens up a foundation of knowledge.

Thi Viet Quynh N.

Great app. Good selection of book summaries you can read or listen to while commuting. Instead of scrolling through your social media news feed, this is a much better way to spend your spare time in my opinion.

Jonathan A.

Life changing. The concept of being able to grasp a book's main point in such a short time truly opens multiple opportunities to grow every area of your life at a faster rate.

Renee D.

Great app. Addicting. Perfect for wait times, morning coffee, evening before bed. Extremely well written, thorough, easy to use.