Try Blinkist to get the key ideas from 7,500+ bestselling nonfiction titles and podcasts. Listen or read in just 15 minutes.
Get started
Blink 3 of 8 - The 5 AM Club
by Robin Sharma
Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies
'The Myth of the Rational Voter' by Bryan Caplan challenges the belief that democratic societies make smart choices. Voters are found to be irrational and ignorant, leading to poor policies and inefficient government.
Many people consider democracy and democratic governance to be two of humanity’s greatest achievements.
After all, democracy is based on a miracle: the miracle of aggregation. Essentially, this refers to the phenomenon that an average answer given by a group tends to be correct.
So, if you ask some people to estimate how many beans are in a glass, some will guess too high and some too low. But when you average out their answers, the deviation in either direction will balance out, making the average very close to the correct number.
When this idea is applied to politics, it’s plain to see that the average voter is not very well informed and that his assessments of political issues tend to be wrong. But, interestingly enough, the divergent opinions of a large group of voters will average out to close to what is true. So, in a democracy, uninformed or extreme positions tend to nullify one another, leading to a more informed and moderate result.
And it’s precisely this middle way between the extremes that makes democracy such a sensible system. In a perfect democracy, popular ideas prevail while extreme viewpoints cancel each other out because of the miracle of aggregation.
This is what makes democratic governments better than dictatorships, in which only certain elites have a say and often hold opinions that are contrary to those of the majority. For example, when the East German government built the Berlin Wall in 1961, the decision stood in stark contrast to the general political sentiment of the East German people. If the country had been a democratic one, the miracle of aggregation would have never allowed such a wall to be built.
So, the miracle of aggregation is what makes democracy function. But sometimes democracies don’t work – and you’re about to learn why.
The Myth of the Rational Voter (2007) is all about the barriers our democracy faces and why they matter. These blinks break down the various misconceptions people have regarding democracy, explaining how they connect to flaws in the democratic method and show why our current forms of democracy don’t work.
The Myth of the Rational Voter (2007) by Bryan Caplan challenges conventional wisdom and offers a fresh perspective on democracy and voter behavior. Here's why this book is worth reading:
If voters are systematically mistaken about what policies work, there is a striking implication: they will not be satisfied by the politicians they elect.
It's highly addictive to get core insights on personally relevant topics without repetition or triviality. Added to that the apps ability to suggest kindred interests opens up a foundation of knowledge.
Great app. Good selection of book summaries you can read or listen to while commuting. Instead of scrolling through your social media news feed, this is a much better way to spend your spare time in my opinion.
Life changing. The concept of being able to grasp a book's main point in such a short time truly opens multiple opportunities to grow every area of your life at a faster rate.
Great app. Addicting. Perfect for wait times, morning coffee, evening before bed. Extremely well written, thorough, easy to use.
Try Blinkist to get the key ideas from 7,500+ bestselling nonfiction titles and podcasts. Listen or read in just 15 minutes.
Get startedBlink 3 of 8 - The 5 AM Club
by Robin Sharma
What is the main message of The Myth of the Rational Voter?
The main message of The Myth of the Rational Voter is that voters are not always rational in their decision-making.
How long does it take to read The Myth of the Rational Voter?
The reading time for The Myth of the Rational Voter varies depending on the reader's speed, but it typically takes several hours. However, the Blinkist summary can be read in just 15 minutes.
Is The Myth of the Rational Voter a good book? Is it worth reading?
The Myth of the Rational Voter provides valuable insights into the irrationality of voter behavior. It's definitely worth a read.
Who is the author of The Myth of the Rational Voter?
The author of The Myth of the Rational Voter is Bryan Caplan.