Get the key ideas from
Rogue States
The Rule of Force in World Affairs
In Rogue States, Noam Chomsky holds a critical lens to the nature of state capitalism and to American Foreign Policy, providing an alternative view to the one proposed by government rhetoric and mainstream media.
- Anyone with an interest in the power structure of states in international relations
- Those seeking an alternative commentary on US political and economic affairs to that offered by mainstream media
- Those interested in a critique of state capitalism
Noam Chomsky is a world-famous linguist, philosopher, historian and radical political critic. His popular writing focuses primarily on the subjects of war, politics and the mass media.
Go Premium and get the best of Blinkist
Upgrade to Premium now and get unlimited access to the Blinkist library. Read or listen to key insights from the world’s best nonfiction.
Upgrade to PremiumWhat is Blinkist?
The Blinkist app gives you the key ideas from a bestselling nonfiction book in just 15 minutes. Available in bitesize text and audio, the app makes it easier than ever to find time to read.
Start free trialDiscover
3,000+ top
nonfiction titles
Get unlimited access to the most important ideas in business, investing, marketing, psychology, politics, and more. Stay ahead of the curve with recommended reading lists curated by experts.
Start free trialJoin Blinkist to get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Rogue States
The Rule of Force in World Affairs
- Read in 13 minutes
- Contains 9 key ideas
Synopsis
In Rogue States, Noam Chomsky holds a critical lens to the nature of state capitalism and to American Foreign Policy, providing an alternative view to the one proposed by government rhetoric and mainstream media.
Key idea 1 of 9
The term ‘rogue state’ was invented by the United States to eliminate opposition and maintain control globally.
By objective definition, a ‘rogue state’ is a country that unilaterally violates international laws and norms, and in doing so poses a serious risk to international peace and security.
In the post-Cold War, pre-9/11 era, US foreign policy and planning largely centered on targeting ‘rogue states.’ However, the list of states that qualified as ‘rogue’ suggests that this concept is not as clear-cut – and its purpose not as noble – as would first seem.
Consider the state of Cuba, which has consistently been defined and treated as a rogue by the United States for its alleged involvement in international terrorism. This is despite the fact that Cuba has not been directly linked to any such offense in well over a decade.
On the other hand, Indonesian dictator General Suharto, who oversaw the massacre of at least 100,000 inhabitants of East Timor, has not only been exempt from the list but also received implicit US support for many years.
The difference between the two? Cuba has vehemently rejected US economic and political orthodoxy, while Indonesia willingly supported their international objectives.
This selective adherence to the definition of ‘rogue’ demonstrates that, in a period exempt from clearly defined enemies such as ‘communists’ or ‘terrorists,’ ‘rogue state’ acts as a murky, catch-all term to target any state not willing to facilitate US political and economic interests. The extent of US power and influence results in almost complete international isolation for states that acquire the label, making it an extremely powerful tool at the hands of the global superpower.
The term ‘rogue state’ was invented by the United States to eliminate opposition and maintain control globally.
Key ideas in this title
- The term ‘rogue state’ was invented by the United States to eliminate opposition and maintain control globally.
- The United States is itself a ‘rogue state’ – its position of power has been created and maintained through force.
- Economic objectives drive US foreign policy and foreign interventions.
- To maintain legitimacy, the United States touts itself as a humanitarian savior.
- The mainstream media is instrumental to the United States’ power.
- The United States disregards or invokes international law at will.
- The current global order benefits the few at the cost of the majority of the world.
- It is market forces that truly drive and control the current world order.
- Final summary
