<p>Who is the author of Losing Earth?</p>

<p>The author of Losing Earth is Nathaniel Rich.</p>

Nature & the Environment

Losing Earth Book Summary - Losing Earth Book explained in key points

Listen to the Intro

00:00

Losing Earth summary

Name: Losing Earth
Rating: 4.4 (152 reviews)
Author: Nathaniel Rich

Nathaniel Rich

A Recent History

4.4 (152 ratings)

23 mins

Brief summary

"Losing Earth" by Nathaniel Rich is a historical account of the decade-long period from 1979 to 1989, during which the world lost its chance to stop climate change. The book offers insight on the political, economic and social factors that interfered with the negotiations towards a global climate treaty.

Topics

Climate Change

Table of Contents

Losing Earth
Summary of 7 key ideas

Audio & text in the Blinkist app

Key idea 1 of 7

What’s in it for me? A depressing look at missed opportunities.

Climate change is a scientific fact, one we’ve understood since the late 1970s. So, why, in the ensuing decades, have we done so little to slow its steady progress?

These blinks provide the infuriating answer and paint a vivid picture of the earliest push to combat climate change and how this effort was hobbled by big business. Based on in-depth research, they explain how a coordinated effort between politicians and the fossil fuel industry birthed modern climate denialism and put us on the path to an ecological crisis.

The tale told here is so shocking and so important that the New York Times Magazine devoted an entire issue to Nathaniel Rich’s original reporting. Now, this expanded and updated account provides even more insights about how we got here and where we’re headed.

In these blinks, you’ll learn

how hairspray renewed the environmental movement;
why headlines from 1979 still work today; and
who botched our chance to tackle climate change early on.

Scientists have demanded action on climate change for longer than you think.

The site: Geneva, Switzerland. Dozens of prominent scientists from all the world’s major powers have gathered for the first World Climate Conference. Their message is clear: industrial activity is drastically elevating the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. If humanity wants to avoid disaster, we need to act now.

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? It could almost be a headline from this morning’s news. But this event didn’t happen yesterday or even last year. It happened in 1979.

The truth is, we’ve long understood the threat of man-made climate change. For decades, scientists have known of the causes, the disastrous effects, and how to avoid them. But, despite their efforts, we have failed to make the necessary changes.

The key message here is: Scientists have demanded action on climate change for longer than you think.

We can trace the modern push to stop climate change back to 1979. This was the year that Rafe Pomerance, an environmentalist working for Friends of the Earth, stumbled upon a startling report. It was put out by the Jasons, a scientific think tank led by geophysicist Gordon MacDonald.

The report claimed that human activity was on track to doubling the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It predicted that this change would set off a greenhouse effect, raising global temperatures and causing widespread ecological disruption. It was a nightmare scenario but based on solid arguments.

Alarmed, Pomerance contacted MacDonald. The two decided to use their connections in government to push for drastic change to avoid this fate. Over the next few months, they met with everyone they could in Washington. They talked with congressmen, the National Security Council, even senior staff of the president’s Office of Science and Technology Policy.

The response was reassuring. The officials seemed to take the threat seriously. By July, Jule Charney, a leading meteorologist, organized a conference of top scientific minds to address the issue. And at the conference, NASA scientist Jim Hansen presented detailed computer models confirming the predictions made by Pomerance and MacDonald.

The result of this collaboration was a final report, sometimes called The Charney Report, titled Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. It synthesized all the known variables into a clear narrative: If nothing changed, the world’s average temperature would go up three degrees. The results would be disastrous.

Early climate change legislation was stymied by indifference and indecision.

October 1980. A diverse team of politicians, energy experts, and environmentalists meet at the Pink Palace, a gaudy resort in southern Florida. They’ve been assembled by Congress as part of the National Commission on Air Quality. Their task is to deliver concrete policy proposals for dealing with climate change.

It’s not an easy job. For three days, they debate the urgency, scope, and merit of various approaches to climate change. Some argue for forceful, decisive emergency action. Others call for a measured, mild response.

Activists used congressional hearings to make climate change a popular political issue.

The Pink Palace conference was dispiriting, but what happened next was even worse. Four days after the inconclusive meeting, Ronald Reagan was elected president. The new Commander-in-Chief was aggressively right wing, and his administration’s priority was shrinking the federal government, not the world’s climate footprint.

Once in office, Reagan deregulated the mining industry, increased coal production, and opened up more public lands for oil drilling. On top of this, he gutted the Department of Energy and appointed Anne Gorsuch, an extreme anti-environmentalist, to oversee the Department of the Interior.

The ozone crisis reinvigorated a waning climate change movement.

Back in 1979, when Pomerance and MacDonald first raised the alarm about the greenhouse effect, they had one major success. They convinced the Carter Administration to fund a comprehensive study on climate change. Now, in October 1983, the National Academy of Sciences was prepared to deliver their findings.

Unsurprisingly, the projections were grim. The Academy’s 500-page dissertation contained the same basic facts and dire warnings as the earlier Charney Report. Yet, when presenting the findings to the press, the Academy followed the Reagan Administration’s line: climate change was no real threat, and if it was, we could easily adapt.

In the mid-1980s, bipartisan, international climate action was a real possibility.

It’s 1985, and Pomerance is talking to Republican congressional staffer Curtis Moore about the need for urgent action on climate change. Moore listens and gives his honest advice. Carbon emissions may be a big problem, but without an attainable solution, no politician will take it on. Politicians don’t like failing.

A year earlier, this assessment would have been discouraging. However, with the successful fight against CFCs still fresh in the cultural zeitgeist, tackling carbon output doesn’t seem like such a losing proposition.

Mild climate-change action received strong pushback from the fossil fuel industry.

The 1980s ended with a flurry of activity. In June 1988, the hottest June in history, Hansen once again testified before Congress, forcefully stating that climate change was a real, present danger. The world needed to act immediately.

Four days later, his call was answered. Representatives from 46 countries gathered in Toronto for the World Conference on the Changing Atmosphere. After lengthy talks, the representatives adopted the first-ever international benchmarks for climate reduction. Taking a target suggested by Pomerance, the world’s industrialized powers tentatively agreed to reduce carbon emissions by 20 percent by the year 2005.

The United States government abandoned its duty to lead on climate action.

May 1989. Hansen is preparing to testify before Congress. Like so many times before, he sends his statements to the White House for approval. It’s usually a routine procedure, a formality that he must conduct as a representative of NASA. However, this time, it’s different.

His notes come back full of edits and mark-ups. The Office of Management and Budget wants major changes. They want him to call his findings mere “estimates,” to refer to his solid models as “unreliable,” and to suggest that the cause of climate change is “scientifically unknown.”

Want to see all full key ideas from Losing Earth?

Key ideas in Losing Earth

More knowledge in less time

Read or listen

Get the key ideas from nonfiction bestsellers in minutes, not hours.

Find your next read

Get book lists curated by experts and personalized recommendations.

Shortcasts ^New

We’ve teamed up with podcast creators to bring you key insights from podcasts.

What is Losing Earth about?

Losing Earth (2019) tells the story of climate change, both as a scientific fact and as a political conflict. This detailed piece of long-form reporting recounts the scientific community’s early push to raise the alarm about climate change and the coordinated effort the fossil fuel industry made to thwart those warnings.

Losing Earth Review

Losing Earth by Nathaniel Rich (2019) is a must-read for anyone concerned about the climate crisis. Here's why this book is worth your time:

Presenting a compelling narrative of the crucial decade from 1979 to 1989, it offers a deep understanding of the missed opportunities to address global warming.
With meticulous research and interviews with key players, the book presents a comprehensive analysis of the political, economic, and social factors that hindered progress.
The urgency it conveys leaves no room for indifference; it serves as a timely reminder that our actions today are shaping the future of our planet.

Best quote from Losing Earth

The balloon could be patched, the eggshell bandaged, the ceiling replastered. There was still time.

—Nathaniel Rich

Who should read Losing Earth?

Environmentalists eager to understand their enemy
Political moderates needing a dose of reality
Anyone concerned about the future of Earth

About the Author

Nathaniel Rich is an award-winning journalist and novelist. His nonfiction work has regularly appeared in the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, and The New York Review of Books.

Categories with Losing Earth

Nature & the Environment Politics

Book summaries like Losing Earth

Farmageddon

Philip Lymbery with Isabel Oakeshott

The True Cost of Cheap Meat

What happens if climate change takes its course

Surviving the Climate Crisis

Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?

The Facts and the Solutions

15 min

3.8

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People

Stephen R. Covey

Powerful Lessons in Personal Change

An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones

25 min

4.6

Neha Sangwan

From Burned Out to Fully Charged at Work and in Life

The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know

22 min

4.6

In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts

Gabor Maté

Close Encounters with Addiction

19 min

4.4

Long-Term Thinking for a Short-Sighted World

Jim Brumm

Restoring happiness, balance, and sanity to our lives and our planet

18 min

3.8

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Mark Twain

Freedom, Civilization, and Prejudice in the Pre-Civil War South

20 min

4.6

Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels

Ian Morris

How Human Values Evolve

22 min

4.0

The Little Book of Stoicism

Jonas Salzgeber

Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness

How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action

Feel Great and Look Your Best with the New Science of Autojuvenation

15 min

3.8

The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck

Mark Manson

A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

22 min

4.3

This Is Why You Dream

Rahul Jandial

What Your Sleeping Brain Reveals About Your Waking Life

18 min

4.3

The Singularity Is Nearer

Ray Kurzweil

When We Merge with AI

17 min

4.4

Killing the Witches

Bill O'Reilly & Martin Dugard

The Horror of Salem, Massachusetts

19 min

4.1

Until the End of Time

Brian Greene

Mind, Matter, and Our Search for Meaning in an Evolving Universe

28 min

4.5

I Respectfully Disagree

Justin Jones-Fosu

How to Have Difficult Conversations in a Divided World

15 min

4.1

So Good They Can't Ignore You

Cal Newport

Why Skills Trump Passion in the Quest for Work You Love

19 min

4.4

The Metaverse Handbook

QuHarrison Terry & Scott “DJ Skee” Keeney

Innovating for the Internet’s Next Tectonic Shift

18 min

4.2

Adventures in the Anthropocene

Gaia Vince

A Journey to the Heart of the Planet We Made

30 min

4.2

The Art of Reading Minds

Henrik Fexeus

Understand Others to Get What You Want

The New Science of How Your Body Can Heal Itself

19 min

4.5

Single, Dating, Engaged, Married

Ben Stuart

Navigating Life and Love in the Modern Age

A Memoir Of The Cuban Missile Crisis

8 min

3.4

The Uninhabitable Earth

David Wallace-Wells

A Story of the Future

The Open Society and Its Enemies

Karl R. Popper

Examine the Defense of Democracy and Freedom

How Trees Can Help You Find Health and Happiness

The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming

28 min

4.2

23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism

Ha-Joon Chang

Why capitalism is not what you think it is.

Benjamin Spall and Michael Xander

How Successful People Start Every Day Inspired

27 min

4.1

How to Eat to Change How You Drink

Brooke Scheller

Heal Your Gut, Mend Your Mind, and Improve Nutrition to Change Your Relationship with Alcohol

19 min

4.0

Merchants of Doubt

Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway

How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues From Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming

How to Nurture Our Most Valued Connections

17 min

4.1

Surrounded by Narcissists

Thomas Erikson

How to Effectively Recognize, Avoid, and Defend Yourself Against Toxic People (and Not Lose Your Mind)

21 min

4.3

Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus

John Gray

A Practical Guide for Improving Communication and Getting What You Want in Your Relationships

6 Mindsets to Become Who You Were Created to Be

How Fast, Inexpensive, Restrained, and Elegant Methods Ignite Innovation

Find Out What People Really Think, What They Really Want, and Who They Really Are

How to Start Conversations that Get Results

One Woman's Quest to Find Out If Self-Help Really Can Change Her Life

28 min

4.1

The Serendipity Mindset

Christian Busch

The Art and Science of Creating Good Luck

Finding Work That Works for You

13 min

4.0

People ❤️ Blinkist

Sven O.

It's highly addictive to get core insights on personally relevant topics without repetition or triviality. Added to that the apps ability to suggest kindred interests opens up a foundation of knowledge.

Thi Viet Quynh N.

Great app. Good selection of book summaries you can read or listen to while commuting. Instead of scrolling through your social media news feed, this is a much better way to spend your spare time in my opinion.

Jonathan A.

Life changing. The concept of being able to grasp a book's main point in such a short time truly opens multiple opportunities to grow every area of your life at a faster rate.

Renee D.

Great app. Addicting. Perfect for wait times, morning coffee, evening before bed. Extremely well written, thorough, easy to use.