Unfair Buchzusammenfassung - das Wichtigste aus Unfair

Einleitung anhören

00:00

Zusammenfassung von Unfair

Name: Unfair
Rating: 4.2 (13 reviews)
Author: Adam Benforado

Adam Benforado

The New Science of Criminal Justice

4.2 (13 Bewertungen)

28 Min.

Kurz zusammengefasst

"Unfair" by Adam Benforado discusses how our justice system is flawed due to unconscious biases. It exposes how what is perceived as fairness is often just a mirage, and how these flaws impact our society.

Themen

Politik der USA Geschichte der USA

Inhaltsübersicht

Unfair
in 12 Kernaussagen verstehen

Audio & Text in der Blinkist App

Kernaussage 1 von 12

What’s in it for me? Discover what’s wrong with our legal system and what we can do about it.

In 2000, a 40-year-old, happily married Virginia schoolteacher began experiencing strange sexual urges, which eventually pushed him to begin collecting child pornography and even pushed him to attempt to molest his stepdaughter. When the man later sought help for severe headaches, a brain scan revealed a large tumor in his brain.

When the tumor was removed, all of his abnormal sexual urges disappeared. This unsettling episode raises important questions about criminality and guilt; in a case like this, who is really committing the crime, the man or the tumor?

And it is not only criminals whose behavior can be easily and unconsciously swayed by neurological shifts in the brain; judges, lawyers, cops and juries are all subject to cognitive biases that, taken together, have helped create a deeply unfair justice system in the United States.

These blinks will show you how the United States’ justice system is corrupted from all sides by our faulty brains, as well as the steps we can take to make the system fair.

In these blinks, you’ll learn

how David Rosenbaum of The New York Times died from a vomit stain on his shoulder;
why judges judge more fairly after lunch; and
why current ways of punishing criminals are just not working.

Hastily assigning the wrong labels to people can lead to unfair treatment.

Can a vomit stain make the difference between life and death? It did for New York Times reporter David Rosenbaum. After he was attacked on the street, passersby who found him lying unconscious on the curb spotted a vomit stain on his jacket. They thus assumed he was just another drunk and not in critical condition.

Tragically, David ultimately died from head injuries, and things might well have turned out differently if he hadn’t been mislabeled.

Unfortunately, these kinds of mistakes aren’t rare. Humans are quick to jump to conclusions based on scant evidence, largely due to the interplay between two main processes that order our brains.

First, the automatic process takes in a scene and forms rapid conclusions based on the evidence presented, disregarding missing pieces. Second, the deliberative mental process works through information more diligently and can override these initial impressions.

In David’s case, firefighters, cops and hospital staff all attributed the vomit stain to drunkenness via the automatic process. Without deferring to the deliberative process, they all discounted the possibility that he was actually in need of urgent medical attention.

This story demonstrates the fact that how we label victims affects how their cases are handled.

Consider this neurological study: when people looked at photos of Olympic athletes, middle-class Americans or the disabled, the region of their brain involved with human interaction was activated. But, when asked to look at photos of homeless people and addicts, participants registered no activity in that area; instead, their brain activity corresponded with feelings of disgust.

This study confirms a sad fact: most of us don’t regard those who are desperately down and out as human beings with feelings and needs. Instead, we tend to view alcoholism and similar disorders as choices, or voluntary behaviors. This tendency is called moral distancing, and it leads us to treat substance abusers differently.

Clearly, we need to avoid assigning damaging labels to others. In the next blink, you’ll find out how.

Suspects are subject to grueling interrogations, which can lead to false confessions.

Consider the story of Juan Rivera, an Illinois man who falsely confessed to the rape and murder of an eleven-year-old girl. His semen didn’t match the sample in the police evidence and he had an alibi, but he was still sent to prison. Although he was eventually freed after wrongly spending over 15 years in prison, the question remains: why do people confess to crimes they didn’t commit?

One key factor is that we automatically assume people believe what they say, even when we have evidence to the contrary. For instance, in one famous study, researchers asked people to evaluate various essays about Fidel Castro. Even though participants were told that the authors had been randomly assigned pro- or anti-Castro positions, readers still believed the pro-Castro writers were genuinely committed to their stances.

Brain trauma and situational factors lead people to criminality.

Few people are born evil. Rather, there are certain behavioral or situational circumstances – like poverty, social pressure or even brain trauma – that can lead people to criminality.

The brain is naturally what controls our thoughts, emotions and behavior, but it is also hugely complex, and different parts of the brain each have a massive impact on how we act.

Like the rest of us, lawyers manage to maintain a virtuous self-image – even when they break rules.

Dishonest behavior is far more common than we’d like to believe; almost everyone breaks rules from time to time. Some people illegally download movies, others fudge the numbers to pad out their expense accounts and students sometimes cheat on tests or assignments.

But here’s the interesting part: we lie to ourselves to justify this kind of unethical behavior, all in order to preserve a virtuous self-image.

Jurors’ life experiences, as well as camera perspective bias, can powerfully influence a verdict.

Any time a politician denies the existence of climate change, people rush to call him an idiot – but is that actually fair? It can be hard to accept, but other people might have a reasonable justification for holding different views from one’s own.

Ultimately, our disagreements reflect differences in our backgrounds, not character flaws.

Human memory is extremely unreliable and erroneous eyewitness accounts lead to wrongful convictions.

We like to think otherwise, but eyewitness accounts are extremely unreliable, and this can have tragic consequences.

This was the case for John Jerome White – an elderly woman wrongly identified him as the man who broke into her home and raped her.

Like the rest of us, experts fail to accurately distinguish lies from truth.

We tend to trust experts, believing that their training and experience allows them to detect lies and unravel the truth. But unfortunately, that’s just not the case.

For starters, regular people and experts alike usually fail at detecting lies, as numerous studies have confirmed. Generally, most of the conventional wisdom we hear about spotting lies isn’t borne out of fact; an averted gaze doesn’t necessarily indicate a fib, and liars tend to fidget less than truth-tellers, not more.

Justice isn’t blind; everything from social background to momentary bouts of hunger can determine judicial bias.

Blind justice is one of the foundational principles of democracy. Accordingly, we expect judges to remain objective and unbiased by keeping their personal views out of the courtroom.

But, of course, that doesn’t always happen. How else would you explain the fact that judges who have a daughter, rather than a son, are 16 percent more likely to decide gender-related civil rights cases in favor of women’s rights?

The public’s desire for retribution skews our justice system.

Nobody wants to admit it, but a central goal of the US justice system is not only to deter potential offenders and incapacitate dangerous people – it also punishes out of vengeance.

To illustrate this point, psychologist Geoff Goodwin looked at public responses to shark attacks in order to determine the extent to which people were motivated by retribution.

Solitary confinement is not only ineffective, it’s torture.

Compared to other countries, the United States’ justice system is unique – and not in a good way. Minor crimes are penalized far more harshly than in other places, and the United States is the only Western country where capital punishment is still legal.

Plus, the prison system continues to embrace solitary confinement. Though proponents argue that keeping inmates in isolation leads to self-reflection and remorse, that’s simply not the case. As we’ve seen in earlier blinks, criminals aren’t necessarily rational people who made bad decisions based on clear reasoning or deliberation.

There are three challenges that must be overcome to have a fairer justice system.

We’ve learned all about the fundamental injustice of the United States’ justice system. If citizens take action, they can reform the justice system to make it fairer. But in doing so, they will face three challenges:

First, they will need to eliminate the establishment-supported notion that simple self-reflection can eliminate bias. Overstating our own objectivity entrenches our most deep-seated biases, which leads to unfair sentences.

The United States must restructure its justice system on the basis of scientific evidence and reduce dependence on human faculties.

As we’ve established, the United States’ justice system has a lot of problems. But the biggest problem of all is the fact that Americans have gotten used to it! This needs to be the starting point for all reform efforts.

In this way, instead of accepting the status quo, Americans can restructure the system on the basis of scientific evidence rather than conventional wisdom.

Du möchtest die gesamte Zusammenfassung von Unfair sehen?

Kernaussagen in Unfair

Mehr Wissen in weniger Zeit

Sachbücher auf den Punkt gebracht

Kernaussagen aus Sachbüchern in ca. 15 Minuten pro Titel lesen & anhören mit den „Blinks”

Zeitsparende Empfehlungen

Titel, die dein Leben bereichern, passend zu deinen Interessen und Zielen

Podcasts in Kurzform ^Neu

Kernaussagen wichtiger Podcasts im Kurzformat mit den neuen „Shortcasts”

Worum geht es in Unfair?

Unfair (2015) outlines the major flaws inherent to the United States’ justice system. In addition to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony or the arbitrary nature of many judges’ decisions, every actor in the entire justice system – cops, lawyers, jurors and judges alike – is fundamentally, yet unconsciously, biased. Ultimately, the author argues that addressing these blind biases is the key to reforming our justice system.

Bestes Zitat aus Unfair

The labels we give victims can make a big difference in how their cases are handled.

—Adam Benforado

Wer Unfair lesen sollte

Anyone interested in law, ethics and society
Lawyers and law students curious about the foundations of the US justice system
Anyone with aspirations to change the world for the better

Über den Autor

Adam Benforado is an associate professor of law at Drexel University. He served as a clerk on the United States Court of Appeals and worked as an attorney at Jenner & Block. His scholarly articles, op-eds and essays have appeared in various publications including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Emory Law Journal.

Kategorien mit Unfair

Psychologie Gesellschaft & Kultur

Ähnliche Zusammenfassungen wie Unfair

Doing Justice

Preet Bharara

A Prosecutor’s Thoughts on Crime, Punishment, and the Rule of Law

29 min

4.7

The 50th Law

50 Cent and Robert Greene

50 Cent's Secrets to Fearlessness and Success

18 min

4.0

When the Body Says No

Gabor Maté

The Cost of Hidden Stress

26 min

4.6

A Peace to End All Peace

David Fromkin

The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and Creation of the Modern Middle East

The Macedonian who conquered the world

28 min

4.6

AI 2041

Kai-Fu Lee and Chen Qiufan

Ten Visions for Our Future

A Guide to Developing Life’s Most Important Skill

A look into the triumphs and tragedies of the Roman Empire's first twelve emperors

The long-awaited memoir of infamous whistleblower Edward Snowden

What It Means for the West

The Hidden Gifts of People Who Think in Pictures, Patterns, and Abstractions

The Science and Art of Longevity

The Bulletproof Plan to Age Backward and Maybe Even Live Forever

Making Smarter Decisions When You Don’t Have All the Facts

21 min

4.4

A People’s History of the United States

Howard Zinn

A brilliant and moving history of the American people

35 min

4.0

Read People Like a Book

Patrick King

How to Analyze, Understand, and Predict People’s Emotions, Thoughts, Intentions, and Behaviors

21 min

4.0

The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem

Nathaniel Branden

The Definitive Work on Self-Esteem by the Leading Pioneer in the Field

19 min

4.3

What Your ADHD Child Wishes You Knew

Sharon Saline

Working Together to Empower Kids for Success in School and Life

When It Works and When It Doesn't

What We Should Know about the People We Don’t Know

21 min

4.0

Back Channel to Cuba

William M. LeoGrande & Peter Kornbluh

The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and Havana

Creative Living Beyond Fear

12 min

4.2

American Prometheus

Kai Bird & Martin J Sherwin

The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer

How Britain Made the Modern World

29 min

4.6

The Simple Path to Wealth

J L Collins

Your Road Map to Financial Independence and a Rich, Free Life

17 min

3.8

The Secret Barrister

Stories of the Law and How It’s Broken

21 min

4.2

The Drama of the Gifted Child

Alice Miller

The Search for the True Self

13 min

4.1

Good Strategy, Bad Strategy

Richard Rumelt

The Difference and Why It Matters

21 min

4.2

The Seven Sins of Memory

Daniel L. Schacter

How the Mind Forgets and Remembers

20 min

4.2

The Wisdom of Insecurity

Alan Watts

A Message for an Age of Anxiety

11 min

4.4

A Year of Positive Thinking

Cyndie Spiegel

Daily Inspiration, Wisdom, and Courage

22 min

3.9

SuperFreakonomics

Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance

Find Out What People Really Think, What They Really Want, and Who They Really Are

16 min

4.5

Jerusalem

Simon Sebag Montefiore

The Art of Understanding Others

24 min

3.9

Financial Intelligence for Entrepreneurs

Karen Berman & Joe Knight with John Case

What You Really Need to Know about the Numbers

7 min

3.2

Democracy in America

Alexis de Tocqueville

Explore This Brilliant Analysis of American Democracy

Rich Dad’s Retire Young Retire Rich

Robert T. Kiyosaki

How to Get Rich Quickly and Stay Rich Forever!

Truth, Transparency, and Trust

A Concise History of a Nation Reborn

30 min

3.9

The Daily Stoic

Ryan Holiday & Stephen Hanselman

366 Meditations on Wisdom, Perseverance and the Art of Living

33 min

4.7

80/20 Sales and Marketing

Perry Marshall

The Definitive Guide to Working Less and Making More

14 min

4.2

The Desert and the Sea

Michael Scott Moore

977 Days Captive on the Somali Pirate Coast

Understanding How Good People Turn Evil

18 min

4.4

What I Talk About When I Talk About Running

Haruki Murakami

A memoir about running and writing

24 min

4.3

Own Your Past Change Your Future

John Delony

A Not-So-Complicated Approach to Relationships, Mental Health & Wellness

18 min

4.6

Emotional Intelligence

Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!

Richard P. Feynman

Adventures of a Curious Character

The Official TED Guide to Public Speaking

16 min

4.5

❤️ für Blinkist️️️

Ines S.

Ich bin begeistert. Ich liebe Bücher aber durch zwei kleine Kinder komme ich einfach nicht zum Lesen. Und ja, viele Bücher haben viel bla bla und die Quintessenz ist eigentlich ein Bruchteil.

Genau dafür ist Blinkist total genial! Es wird auf das Wesentliche reduziert, die Blinks sind gut verständlich, gut zusammengefasst und auch hörbar! Das ist super. 80 Euro für ein ganzes Jahr klingt viel, aber dafür unbegrenzt Zugriff auf 3000 Bücher. Und dieses Wissen und die Zeitersparnis ist unbezahlbar.

Ekaterina S.

Extrem empfehlenswert. Statt sinnlos im Facebook zu scrollen höre ich jetzt täglich zwischen 3-4 "Bücher". Bei manchen wird schnelle klar, dass der Kauf unnötig ist, da schon das wichtigste zusammen gefasst wurde..bei anderen macht es Lust doch das Buch selbständig zu lesen. Wirklich toll

Nils S.

Einer der besten, bequemsten und sinnvollsten Apps die auf ein Handy gehören. Jeden morgen 15-20 Minuten für die eigene Weiterbildung/Entwicklung oder Wissen.

Julia P.

Viele tolle Bücher, auf deren Kernaussagen reduziert- präzise und ansprechend zusammengefasst. Endlich habe ich das Gefühl, Zeit für Bücher zu finden, für die ich sonst keine Zeit habe.