Try Blinkist to get the key ideas from 7,500+ bestselling nonfiction titles and podcasts. Listen or read in just 15 minutes.
Start your free trialBlink 3 of 8 - The 5 AM Club
by Robin Sharma
A groundbreaking study in how science progresses
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn explains how science advances through paradigm shifts. It challenges the idea of scientific progress as a linear accumulation of knowledge and proposes a new model for understanding scientific change.
Imagine a scientific laboratory. Do you see a frazzled man in a white lab coat, mixing strange chemicals in smoking test tubes, unsure as to how his experiments will turn out?
Well, that’s not exactly how the scientific method works. Truth is, experiments are never done randomly; scientists know precisely what they want to test. And often, they can even predict the outcome before they start.
They can make these predictions because of paradigms, frameworks of accepted theories and shared knowledge that govern scientific work. For example, Newtonian physics is a paradigm that relies on Newton’s laws of motion.
This kind of shared knowledge is crucial, because it gives scientists a foundation to build upon. By accepting some fundamental principles developed by previous research, scientists can concentrate on supplementing established ideas, rather than constantly reestablishing an initial framework.
Because, ultimately, a paradigm is just that – a framework. It can’t explain everything, since there are always going to be gaps in our knowledge and disjunctions between scientific theory and hard reality.
That’s why most scientists spend their time mopping up, that is, trying to plug the knowledge gaps and align theory with reality. For instance, Newton’s ideas were brilliant, but the equipment he used to conduct his research was rudimentary. And that produced certain ambiguities. In the following centuries, scientists developed equipment and devised experiments to address those knowledge gaps. This rigorous research led to our deeper understanding of Newtonian laws.
And, as mentioned earlier, when they’re mopping up, scientists pretty much know what kind of results they can expect. Because the paradigm governs their thinking, they don’t really expect to produce a novel outcome that falls outside the theoretical framework.
As we’ll discover in the next blink, however, scientists who aren’t looking for novelty often stumble upon it anyway.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is a groundbreaking study in the history of science and philosophy. It explains how scientists conduct research and provides an interesting (if controversial) explanation of scientific progress.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) by Thomas S. Kuhn is a thought-provoking exploration of how scientific progress happens. Here's why this book is a must-read:
It's highly addictive to get core insights on personally relevant topics without repetition or triviality. Added to that the apps ability to suggest kindred interests opens up a foundation of knowledge.
Great app. Good selection of book summaries you can read or listen to while commuting. Instead of scrolling through your social media news feed, this is a much better way to spend your spare time in my opinion.
Life changing. The concept of being able to grasp a book's main point in such a short time truly opens multiple opportunities to grow every area of your life at a faster rate.
Great app. Addicting. Perfect for wait times, morning coffee, evening before bed. Extremely well written, thorough, easy to use.
Try Blinkist to get the key ideas from 7,500+ bestselling nonfiction titles and podcasts. Listen or read in just 15 minutes.
Start your free trialBlink 3 of 8 - The 5 AM Club
by Robin Sharma
What is the main message of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions?
The main message of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is about paradigm shifts in scientific progress.
How long does it take to read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions?
The reading time for The Structure of Scientific Revolutions varies based on reading speed. However, the Blinkist summary can be read in a short amount of time.
Is The Structure of Scientific Revolutions a good book? Is it worth reading?
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is worth reading for its insights into the development of scientific knowledge and the nature of scientific revolutions.
Who is the author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions?
The author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is Thomas S. Kuhn.