Critique of Pure Reason Buchzusammenfassung - das Wichtigste aus Critique of Pure Reason

Einleitung anhören

00:00

Zusammenfassung von Critique of Pure Reason

Name: Critique of Pure Reason
Rating: 4.6 (509 reviews)
Author: Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant

A groundbreaking and influential philosophy classic about the limits of human reason

4.6 (509 Bewertungen)

44 Min.

Themen

Theoretische Philosophie Westliche Philosophie

Inhaltsübersicht

Critique of Pure Reason
in 14 Kernaussagen verstehen

Audio & Text in der Blinkist App

Kernaussage 1 von 14

What’s in it for me? Get a handle on some of the most complicated ideas in the history of Western philosophy.

What is the nature of space and time? Is the world governed by the law of cause and effect – and if so, why? These are just two of the fascinating questions that Kant raises in the Critique of Pure Reason. His answers are thought-provoking, revolutionary, and even downright mind-blowing.

Unfortunately, they’re also buried in 856 pages of some of the most impenetrable prose ever written. Kant himself described it as “dry, obscure, opposed to all ordinary notions, and moreover long-winded.” Even Kant scholars are unsure of how to understand the Critique’s incredibly complicated arguments, and they’ve put forward many competing interpretations.

In light of these facts, these blinks can only present an interpretation of some of Kant’s main ideas, skipping over many technical details. Fortunately, most of these details are of interest only to scholars. For the rest of us, the gist of Kant’s ideas provide more than enough food for thought.

In these blinks, you’ll learn about

the surprising nature of space and time;
the shocking truth behind the law of causality; and
the sobering lesson that reason must learn about its own limitations.

Before they build a metaphysical system, philosophers must assess the origin and nature of our minds’ mental materials.

Imagine you’re a builder living in medieval times. One day, the king summons you to a construction site. He points at a massive pile of building materials and says, “I want you to turn this into a tower that reaches heaven – or as close as possible, at least.” What do you do?

Well, you should begin by inquiring into the materials. What are they made of? How strong are they? By answering these questions, you'll be able to tell how tall you can build the tower. The alternative is to just start building and hope for the best – a recipe for disaster if you end up going higher than the materials can bear.

The same argument applies to philosophers when they want to build a metaphysical system.

The key message here is: Before they build a metaphysical system, philosophers must assess the origin and nature of our minds’ mental materials.

Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that tries to elevate our knowledge of the world into the loftiest realms of human inquiry. Using the abstract concepts and logical principles of reason, it attempts to go beyond the empirical evidence of the natural sciences and grasp the ultimate nature of reality.

Consider time, for instance. Does it have a beginning? Or does it stretch back into eternity? These are examples of metaphysical questions. Answer a bunch of them, tie your answers together into a coherent body of thought, and you have a metaphysical system.

Since the days of ancient Greece, many philosophers have attempted to build various metaphysical systems. But prior to the Critique of Pure Reason, most of them tried to do so without first inquiring into the origins and nature of our minds’ mental materials. They just took the concepts and logical principles they had at hand and started building with them.

But are those materials actually fit for the task of metaphysics? And if so, how high do they allow us to build our metaphysical towers, so to speak? If the answer is “all the way to heaven,” then great – build away. But if it’s “not very far,” then we should stay closer to the earth – contenting ourselves with the more mundane knowledge of the sciences, while leaving the more esoteric stuff to religion.

Either way, we need to know the answer in advance. Otherwise, we’ll be in danger of building a tower that will crumble beneath our feet.

To avoid the danger of metaphysical dogmatism, philosophers must conduct a critique of pure reason.

Alright, so our metaphysical tower might come crashing down if we don’t investigate the mental materials we’re going to build it out of. But so what? After all, it’s not an actual, physical tower. It’s just a bunch of ideas. No one’s going to get hurt if it falls. So why not just build and see what happens?

Because that's not a very philosophical approach. In fact, it would be the opposite of philosophy, which is dogmatism.

By failing to avoid the danger of dogmatism, philosophy encourages the spread of skepticism.

If you’re a philosopher, dogmatism is one of the worst accusations imaginable. But if you’re just a normal person, you might shrug your shoulders. So what if we go on metaphysical flights of fancy? Again, we’re just dealing with abstract ideas about esoteric subjects here, so what’s the big deal?

The problem is that dogmatism can empower another enemy of philosophy: skepticism. And this one doesn’t just endanger philosophy, but all human knowledge in general.

Both religion and science depend on metaphysical concepts, making skepticism a danger to both of them.

For those of us living in the age of “fake news” and “alternative facts,” the problem of skepticism is something we’re already familiar with. In eighteenth-century Europe, when Kant was writing, it also felt like a danger, but for different reasons.

Science was on the rise, and mounting skepticism about metaphysics also meant mounting skepticism about religion. But that skepticism cut both ways, and it was starting to undermine the foundation of science as well.

If reason cannot provide us with a priori knowledge, then it cannot secure our knowledge of mathematics either.

From the idea of God to the notion of causality, all of the metaphysical concepts of religion and science are now in jeopardy. But that’s not all. The same basic argument that applies to metaphysical concepts also applies to something called a priori knowledge.

What’s that? Well, the short answer is that it’s a pretty big deal. Mathematical knowledge depends on it, so now math is in trouble too.

A priori knowledge isn’t innate knowledge; it’s knowledge that the mind produces through its own internal mechanisms.

We’ve come a long way in our journey, so let’s recap: If it’s possible for us to gain metaphysical knowledge, it couldn’t be empirical knowledge derived from experience. It would have to be a priori knowledge derived from reason. So now we’re looking for a way of gaining that.

But is a priori knowledge even possible? If you stop to think about it, the idea of it seems counterintuitive and even downright preposterous. What’s it implying? That we know things like mathematical equations before we have any experience of the world? That we’re somehow born with this knowledge?

The mind can be divided into three main faculties – sensibility, understanding, and reason.

Here’s another way of thinking about a priori knowledge: sure, the mind’s mental machinery wouldn't begin turning its wheels if it didn’t have sense data to process. But at the same time, that data wouldn’t be processed if the machinery wasn’t already there to work on it.

For example, when you were a child, maybe you needed the formula 7 + 5 = 12 written on a chalkboard in order to bring it to your attention. But still, your mind’s mental machinery needed to already have a way of understanding it in order to acquire knowledge of this universal and necessary truth.

To organize sense data into meaningful information, the mind needs predefined ways of structuring them.

Some of the ideas we’re about to explore get a little complicated, but the basic one underlying them is pretty simple. It’s the idea that the mind isn’t just a passive recipient of sense data, as if it were a blank slate. Instead, it plays an active role in shaping that data into meaningful information about the world.

How exactly does it do that? Well, that’s where things get complicated – especially when we delve into the details. But again, the basic ideas are fairly straightforward.

Time and space are pure forms of sensibility, which provide the mind with templates for organizing sense data.

Imagine if your mind didn’t have a framework of space in which it could organize the content of your sensory experience. You’d see a patch of color; let’s say blue. And then – well, that’s it. You couldn’t see another patch at the same time, because there wouldn’t be any space in which they could be co-present. Space is what allows these sensations to be simultaneously part of the same field of vision.

Given how fundamental space is to our minds’ ability to organize our sense data, we can call it a pure form of sensibility. That’s a shorthand way of saying that as a framework for organizing our sensations, space exists in the mind on a “pure,” a priori basis. In other words, the mind already has it ready at hand, prior to experience. It’s like a preprogrammed template the mind can use for structuring its data.

Our minds also contain templates for understanding and reasoning about the world.

By looking at the formal elements of our minds’ sensory content, we were able to identify space and time as the pure forms of sensibility. But sensibility is just one component of the mind; what about understanding and reason?

Remember, these are the mental faculties that enable us to further organize our sense data into concepts, judgments, and logical syllogisms. If we focus on their formal elements, we’ll be able to identify the pure forms of understanding and reason as well.

The mind can use its templates to acquire a priori knowledge and concepts.

Our journey has now taken us far. We’ve gone through the principles of reasoning, the logical functions of understanding, and the pure forms of sensibility – also known as space and time. We’ve skipped some details along the way. For example, Kant identifies 12 logical functions and three principles of reason in total. But the ones we’ve covered will do for our purposes.

We’re now ready to return to our question: How is a priori knowledge possible?

As far as we can know, the categories of understanding only reflect our experience of reality, not reality in itself.

Pretty clear so far, right? Sit tight, the argument goes even further. Not only do we not need any experience to form the concepts that make up the categories of understanding; these concepts help to make our experience possible in the first place.

That’s because conscious experience isn’t just a bunch of sensations in time and space. It’s a combination of those sensations and the thoughts we have about them. These thoughts, in turn, are a matter of making connections between the various sensations and concepts in our minds. For example, you don’t just see a round object; you see it as a bowling ball. Your mind makes a connection between the image – round object, and the concept – bowling ball.

We cannot know anything about reality in itself – even whether it exists in space and time.

If you’ve made it this far, the hard work of following these arguments is about to pay off. We’re now arriving at one of the most infamous, revolutionary, and mind-blowing ideas in the history of Western philosophy.

Ready? Here we go. Three, two, one…

Reason should not venture into metaphysical speculation about the nature of reality in itself.

So wait, are we saying that time, space, and causality don’t exist in external reality – that they exist only in our minds? Not necessarily. This is a very thorny issue within interpretations of Kant’s thought, so let’s just go with the safest one here.

The safest interpretation is that we just don’t know. Maybe time, space, and causality do exist in external reality, and our minds accurately reflect them. Or maybe they don’t, and they’re just the templates of our sensibility and understanding. The point is that we simply cannot tell one way or the other. Wherever we look, we’ll always see things in terms of the frameworks of time, space, and causality that our minds have already imposed on our sense data.

Du möchtest die gesamte Zusammenfassung von Critique of Pure Reason sehen?

Kernaussagen in Critique of Pure Reason

Mehr Wissen in weniger Zeit

Sachbücher auf den Punkt gebracht

Kernaussagen aus Sachbüchern in ca. 15 Minuten pro Titel lesen & anhören mit den „Blinks”

Zeitsparende Empfehlungen

Titel, die dein Leben bereichern, passend zu deinen Interessen und Zielen

Podcasts in Kurzform ^Neu

Kernaussagen wichtiger Podcasts im Kurzformat mit den neuen „Shortcasts”

Worum geht es in Critique of Pure Reason?

The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is one of the most groundbreaking, revolutionary, and influential books in the history of Western philosophy. Pointing out the limits of human reason, it argues that we can have knowledge about the world as we experience it, but we can never know anything about the ultimate nature of reality.

Wer Critique of Pure Reason lesen sollte

Skeptics
Students of philosophy
Adherents of both science and religion

Über den Autor

Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth-century German philosopher who was one of the main thinkers of the Enlightenment. He was the central figure behind the philosophical movement that became known as German Idealism, which transformed Western philosophy and set in motion developments in the discipline that continue to this day. His main works are his three Critiques: the Critique of Pure Reason, the Critique of Practical Reason, and the Critique of Judgment.

Kategorien mit Critique of Pure Reason

Philosophie

Ähnlich wie Critique of Pure Reason

Beyond Good and Evil

Friedrich Nietzsche

How to free yourself from philosophical dogmas and assert your own values

25 min

4.7

Meditations on First Philosophy

René Descartes

Descartes Most Famous Philosophical Classic

11 min

4.2

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

David Hume

A classic in modern philosophical literature

One of the most important philosophical texts ever written

Schopenhauer's take on will and deliberation

17 min

4.4

The Origins of Totalitarianism

Hannah Arendt

Hannah Arendt's landmark work about Europe's anti-Semitic and imperialist roots

A Critique of Political Economy

19 min

4.4

Thus Spoke Zarathustra

Friedrich Nietzsche

The Classic That Will Challenge Everything You Know

17 min

4.4

The Ethics of Ambiguity

Simone de Beauvoir

A foundational text of existentialist philosophy

19 min

4.5

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

Robert Pirsig

An Inquiry into Values

A Philosophical Masterpiece on the Boundaries Between Good and Evil

The book that launched a revolution

or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil

A Brief History of Humankind

28 min

4.4

Time of the Magicians

Wolfram Eilenberger

Wittgenstein, Benjamin, Cassirer, Heidegger, and the Decade That Reinvented Philosophy

25 min

4.4

Happy Mind, Happy Life

Rangan Chatterjee

The New Science of Mental Well-Being

18 min

4.5

The Interpretation of Dreams

Sigmund Freud

Sigmund Freud’s influential cornerstone work

A Dystopian Novel on the Perils of State Control & New Technology

What We Should Know about the People We Don’t Know

Machiavelli's classic text on leadership and politics

24 min

4.6

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Ludwig Wittgenstein

Unlock the Secrets of the Universe with This Intellectual Masterpiece

17 min

4.2

The Story of Philosophy

Will Durant

The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers

What to Say to Get Your Way

17 min

4.6

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Daniel Kahneman

Intuition or deliberation? Where you can (and can't) trust your brain

The Birth of the Prison

A Philosophical Tale About the Failures of Government Coercion

20 min

3.7

Zero to One (New Version)

Peter Thiel with Blake Masters

Notes on Startups, or How to Build The Future

Create a Life You Really Love with Less Stress and More Flow

Conversations on Consciousness, Morality, and the Future of Humanity

31 min

4.3

The Wealth of Nations

Adam Smith

The most influential economic book of all time

The Case For Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

24 min

4.0

13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do

Amy Morin

Take Back Your Power, Embrace Change, Face Your Fears and Train Your Brain for Happiness and Success

40 min

4.6

Madness and Civilization

Michel Foucault

A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason

19 min

4.4

Why Nations Fail

Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson

The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty

29 min

4.6

The Great Mental Models

Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien

General Thinking Concepts

26 min

4.5

Reinventing Your Life

Jeffrey E. Young and Janet S. Klosko

The Breakthrough Program to End Negative Behaviour...and Feel Great Again

From Common Curiosity To Logical Reasoning

26 min

4.2

You Can Thrive After Narcissistic Abuse

Melanie Tonia Evans

The #1 System for Recovering from Toxic Relationships

And Other Dangerous Situations

The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking

The Tactics, Routines and Habits of Billionaires, Icons and World-Class Performers

A Very Short Introduction

366 Meditations on Power, Seduction, Mastery, Strategy, and Human Nature

The Science behind Atheism

The Psychology of Persuasion

The Proven Power of Being Kind to Yourself

A Political Satire on the Corrupting Influence of Power

31 min

4.8

The Millionaire Next Door

Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko

The Surprising Secrets of America’s Wealthy

The Macedonian who conquered the world

28 min

4.6

❤️ für Blinkist️️️

Ines S.

Ich bin begeistert. Ich liebe Bücher aber durch zwei kleine Kinder komme ich einfach nicht zum Lesen. Und ja, viele Bücher haben viel bla bla und die Quintessenz ist eigentlich ein Bruchteil.

Genau dafür ist Blinkist total genial! Es wird auf das Wesentliche reduziert, die Blinks sind gut verständlich, gut zusammengefasst und auch hörbar! Das ist super. 80 Euro für ein ganzes Jahr klingt viel, aber dafür unbegrenzt Zugriff auf 3000 Bücher. Und dieses Wissen und die Zeitersparnis ist unbezahlbar.

Ekaterina S.

Extrem empfehlenswert. Statt sinnlos im Facebook zu scrollen höre ich jetzt täglich zwischen 3-4 "Bücher". Bei manchen wird schnelle klar, dass der Kauf unnötig ist, da schon das wichtigste zusammen gefasst wurde..bei anderen macht es Lust doch das Buch selbständig zu lesen. Wirklich toll

Nils S.

Einer der besten, bequemsten und sinnvollsten Apps die auf ein Handy gehören. Jeden morgen 15-20 Minuten für die eigene Weiterbildung/Entwicklung oder Wissen.

Julia P.

Viele tolle Bücher, auf deren Kernaussagen reduziert- präzise und ansprechend zusammengefasst. Endlich habe ich das Gefühl, Zeit für Bücher zu finden, für die ich sonst keine Zeit habe.