Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent summary

Exploring the Dogmas of Modernism

In Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent, Wayne C. Booth sets out to challenge the five dogmas of modernism that have stifled our ability to reason and communicate effectively. These dogmas include the belief that you can't reason about values, that you must doubt whatever can be doubted, that the only good reasons are logical or experimental proof, that you must be consistent in your beliefs, and that you must be an individual in your thinking and acting.

Booth argues that these dogmas are not only unhelpful but also harmful, as they result in a society where people are unable to communicate effectively, and where rational discourse about important issues is impossible. He posits that these dogmas lead to a 'befouled rhetorical climate', where people are either confined to narrow notions of logical or experimental proof, or become irresponsible in defending their values.

Reclaiming the Rhetoric of Assent

In response to these dogmas, Booth proposes a new approach, which he calls the 'rhetoric of assent'. This approach encourages people to engage in open, honest, and respectful dialogue about their values and beliefs, and to seek common ground rather than focusing solely on what divides them.

Booth argues that by embracing the rhetoric of assent, we can create a more productive and inclusive public discourse, where people are encouraged to listen to each other, to be open to changing their minds, and to work towards shared understanding and agreement. He suggests that this approach can help us to address some of the most pressing issues of our time, from climate change to social inequality, in a more effective and meaningful way.

Applying the Rhetoric of Assent

Throughout Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent, Booth illustrates how the rhetoric of assent can be applied across a range of disciplines and contexts. For example, he discusses how this approach can be used in literary criticism to encourage a more open and inclusive interpretation of texts, and in political debate to foster greater understanding and cooperation between opposing viewpoints.

Booth also considers the personal implications of the rhetoric of assent, arguing that it can help individuals to form more authentic and meaningful relationships, based on mutual respect and understanding. He suggests that by embracing this approach, we can all become better listeners, more open-minded thinkers, and more empathetic communicators.

Challenges and Opportunities

While Booth is clear about the potential benefits of the rhetoric of assent, he also acknowledges that it is not without its challenges. He notes that changing deeply ingrained habits of thought and discourse is no easy task, and that it will require a concerted effort from individuals, communities, and institutions alike.

However, Booth is ultimately optimistic about the possibilities of the rhetoric of assent. He believes that by challenging the dogmas of modernism and embracing a more open and inclusive approach to reasoning and communication, we can create a more just, harmonious, and sustainable society. In conclusion, Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent is a powerful call to action, urging us to rethink our current approach to public discourse and to embrace a more constructive and empathetic way of engaging with one another.