Get the key ideas from
Cracked
Why Psychiatry Is Doing More Harm than Good
Cracked gives a clear and detailed overview of the current crisis in psychiatric science: malfunctioning scientific standards and the powerful influence of pharmaceutical companies have caused the overdiagnosis and overmedication of people all over the world.
- Anyone involved in psychiatry
- Anyone receiving psychiatric treatment or considering it
- Anyone interested in the history of prescription drugs
James Davies is a qualified psychotherapist with a Ph.D. in medical and social anthropology. In addition to writing for numerous publications, such as The Times, Daily Mail and The Guardian, he has also published three academic texts with Stanford University Press, Karnac and Routledge.
Go Premium and get the best of Blinkist
Upgrade to Premium now and get unlimited access to the Blinkist library. Read or listen to key insights from the world’s best nonfiction.
Upgrade to PremiumWhat is Blinkist?
The Blinkist app gives you the key ideas from a bestselling nonfiction book in just 15 minutes. Available in bitesize text and audio, the app makes it easier than ever to find time to read.
Start free trialDiscover
3,500+ top
nonfiction titles
Get unlimited access to the most important ideas in business, investing, marketing, psychology, politics, and more. Stay ahead of the curve with recommended reading lists curated by experts.
Start free trialJoin Blinkist to get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Get the key ideas from
Cracked
Why Psychiatry Is Doing More Harm than Good
- Read in 18 minutes
- Contains 11 key ideas
Synopsis
Cracked gives a clear and detailed overview of the current crisis in psychiatric science: malfunctioning scientific standards and the powerful influence of pharmaceutical companies have caused the overdiagnosis and overmedication of people all over the world.
Key idea 1 of 11
Discrepancies in diagnosis are a major problem for psychiatrists, even with a new manual.
Let’s start with a simple question: If you have a mental health issue, how can you be sure a psychiatrist will diagnose it correctly?
Basically, you can’t. The process of diagnosing psychiatric conditions is more subjective than we might think, depending heavily on the whims and even location of the psychiatrist. One study conducted by Dr. David Rosenhan demonstrates the consequences of these highly individual diagnoses.
He sent a group of eight academics to different hospitals, each of them with the complaint that they heard a voice in their heads saying the word “thud,” but were otherwise behaving normally. All of them were diagnosed with various mental disorders and prescribed strong antipsychotic pills. Most were held in hospitals for weeks, even after explaining that they were part of a study!
Furthermore, statistics show that psychiatrists across the world only share a consensus on patient diagnoses for the same patient 32 to 42 percent of the time. However, there are regional similarities in diagnoses. For example, when we compare trends in psychiatric diagnoses across countries, we find that psychiatrists from the US and Russia are twice as likely to diagnose their patients as schizophrenic than their colleagues in Europe.
These discrepancies arise despite the fact that psychologists have already standardized the diagnosis of mental disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the DSM.
The DSM contains all psychiatric disorders known in modern medicine and has been continually edited and refined since its first publication under the title DSM-I in 1952.
However, the standards found in the DSM are based on the consensus of psychiatrists, not on scientific research. For example, homosexuality used to be categorized as a mental disease in DSM-II. This all changed during the gay rights movement in the 1970s, during which psychiatrists voted to remove homosexuality from the manual’s third edition, DSM-III.
Unlike other medical sciences, where doctors can agree if a patient’s leg is broken based on the available evidence, e.g., an X-ray, psychiatrists cannot diagnose patients in a way that enjoys a unanimous consensus.
Key ideas in this title
- Discrepancies in diagnosis are a major problem for psychiatrists, even with a new manual.
- The development of the DSM involves the violation of basic scientific rules.
- Integration of new mental disorders and misuse of the DSM is leading to medicalization of people.
- Big Pharma uses the “chemical imbalance” theory to justify medicalization.
- The chemical imbalance theory isn’t very conclusive.
- Psychiatry’s approach to drugs, especially antidepressants, is fatally flawed.
- The pharmaceutical industry’s coffers are as deep as its manipulative powers are wide.
- Psychiatry uses dangerous social myths to answer our health-related questions.
- Western psychiatry is exporting its harmful mental health practices into new markets worldwide.
- Psychiatry has to prove its scientific legitimacy by changing its paradigm.
- Final summary
