Kategorien entdecken

In der App öffnen In der App öffnen In der App öffnen
Das sind die Blinks zu

Bad Pharma

How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients

Von Ben Goldacre
13 Minuten
Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients von Ben Goldacre

Bad Pharma reveals the shocking truths of the pharmaceutical industry, describing in great detail the ways in which it deceives doctors and patients, and even circumvents standard ethical medical practices, all in pursuit of profits.

  • Any medical doctor or patient
  • Anyone who wants to learn more about the pharmaceutical industry
  • Anyone who takes medication regularly

Ben Goldacre is a medical doctor, writer and research fellow at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. In addition, he wrote Bad Science (also available in blinks) and is best known for his column Bad Science in The Guardian.

Kennst du schon Blinkist Premium?

Mit Blinkist Premium erhältst du Zugang zu dem Wichtigsten aus mehr als 3.000 Sachbuch-Bestsellern. Das Probeabo ist 100% kostenlos.

Premium kostenlos testen

Was ist Blinkist?

Blinkist ist eine App, die die großen Ideen der besten Sachbücher in einprägsame Kurztexte verpackt und erklärt. Die Inhalte der über 3.000 Titel starken Bibliothek reichen von Sachbuch-Klassikern, über populäre Ratgeber bis hin zu diskutierten Neuerscheinungen. Basierend auf wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen wird jeder Titel von speziell geschulten Autoren aufbereitet und dem Nutzer als Kurztext und Audiotitel zur Verfügung gestellt.

Discover
3.000+ top
nonfiction titles

Get unlimited access to the most important ideas in business, investing, marketing, psychology, politics, and more. Stay ahead of the curve with recommended reading lists curated by experts.

Entdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:
Entdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:
Entdecke die Kernaussagen zu diesem Titel:

Bad Pharma

How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients

Von Ben Goldacre
  • Lesedauer: 13 Minuten
  • 8 Kernaussagen
Jetzt kostenloses Probeabo starten Jetzt lesen oder anhören
Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients von Ben Goldacre
Worum geht's

Bad Pharma reveals the shocking truths of the pharmaceutical industry, describing in great detail the ways in which it deceives doctors and patients, and even circumvents standard ethical medical practices, all in pursuit of profits.

Kernaussage 1 von 8

Industry-sponsored studies are likely to produce results that flatter the sponsor’s drug.

So how do we know how effective drugs are? Often we look to medical trials to determine whether certain medicines are worth taking. Unfortunately, however, not all trials are created equally.

Trials that are funded by pharmaceutical companies are more likely to produce results skewed in their favor.

This bias becomes startlingly evident when you look at the results of Harvard and Toronto researchers’ 2010 survey of over five hundred medicinal trials. The survey asked two main questions: Did the results favor the test drug? Were they funded by the industry?

Of the industry-funded studies, 85 percent yielded positive results, compared to only 50 percent of the government-funded trials.

This sort of huge discrepancy indicates that studies sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry produce positive results that cater to industry interests.

In addition, industry-funded trials are often riddled with hidden methodological flaws that make drugs appear better than they are.  

Let’s take a look at the multinational pharmaceutical corporation Pfizer, for example, which published several trials on a drug called Pregabalin designed to treat pain. During these trials, researchers measured participants’ pain at regular intervals.

However, as is often the case in medical trials, some participants exited the study because they were experiencing the drug’s negative side effects.

In these cases, Pfizer decided to take the last measurement of pain severity – while participants were still on the drug – and simply carry that over into the remaining measurements. This technique is deceptive because it disregards the negative side effects.

When the analysis was eventually redone – this time properly – Pfizer’s “last observation” method was unsurprisingly revealed to have overestimated the improvement in pain by about 25 percent.

Mit Premium freischalten Jetzt lesen oder anhören

Inhalt

Mit Premium freischalten Jetzt lesen oder anhören

Bringe mehr Wissen in deinen Alltag!

Sichere dir jetzt Zugang zu den Kernaussagen der besten Sachbücher – praktisch in Text & Audio in nur 15 Minuten pro Titel.
Created with Sketch.